In this field note
Two case-packer quotes can describe different projects while appearing to offer the same machine. Reconcile the material inputs and finished-case output first, then compare installed cost and recurring costs over the same production assumptions.

Define which forming, grouping, loading and closure work each quote includes. Use the blank records below to compare the same project and evaluation period. Enter amounts from dated proposals or your documented operating assumptions.
Normalize the scope before the total
Use the same requirement revision for each proposal. Ask which functions are included, optional or supplied by the buyer. Wexxar’s Flex E Pack catalog separates case forming, product delivery, packing stations and sealing, with optional modifications. Brenton’s RSC solutions likewise describe different case-loading approaches. Those examples show why “case packer” alone does not define the purchased boundary.

| Scope line | Required outcome | Proposal A | Proposal B | Unpriced difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case forming | Accepted open case ready to load | ___ | ___ | ___ |
| Infeed and collation | Correct product group | ___ | ___ | ___ |
| Loading | Product inside case in agreed pattern | ___ | ___ | ___ |
| Closure | Defined completed case | ___ | ___ | ___ |
| Transfers and controls | Named upstream/downstream handoffs | ___ | ___ | ___ |
| Format tooling | Listed product/case combinations | ___ | ___ | ___ |
| Installation and training | Agreed site work and operator scope | ___ | ___ | ___ |
| Trial and acceptance | Samples, conditions and decision rule | ___ | ___ | ___ |
Write “excluded, owner ___” where appropriate. Do not insert a guessed allowance and then present it as a supplier’s price. Keep unresolved additions visible until a written revision supplies them.
Build the installed project cost
Separate one-time capital and commissioning items from production expenses. The accounting treatment belongs to your finance team; the purpose here is to prevent an omitted cost from disappearing when equipment totals are compared.
Copy these tables into your project record or download the blank ownership-cost CSV. Fill the amount columns and calculate the result rows using the formulas shown. The CSV is a manual record with the same fields and formula text.
Set the comparison basis
| Field | Unit or convention | Proposal A | Proposal B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Requirement and quote revisions | References and dates | ___ | ___ |
| Currency and price base date | One currency; identify conversion basis | ___ | ___ |
| Evaluation start and end | Calendar dates | ___ | ___ |
| Evaluation duration | Months; same period for both proposals | ___ | ___ |
| Q: Accepted output over that period | Accepted cases, not produced or nominal cases | ___ | ___ |
| Accounting convention | Tax, overhead and financing included/excluded; undiscounted amounts | ___ | ___ |
Record one-time amounts
Enter each item once. Use zero for a confirmed exclusion with no cost in this comparison; leave an unresolved amount blank and hold the total. Record the scope owner and source beside each amount.
| ID | One-time input | Proposal A amount | Proposal B amount | Dated source / included scope |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I1 | Equipment in the agreed base quote | ___ | ___ | ___ |
| I2 | Approved options excluded from I1 | ___ | ___ | ___ |
| I3 | Delivery, handling and site preparation | ___ | ___ | ___ |
| I4 | Services and utility connections | ___ | ___ | ___ |
| I5 | Integration, commissioning and training | ___ | ___ | ___ |
| I6 | Initial tooling and spare parts | ___ | ___ | ___ |
| I7 | Contingency kept separate from quotations | ___ | ___ | ___ |
| I | Installed project total = I1 + I2 + I3 + I4 + I5 + I6 + I7 | ___ | ___ | Calculate after all inputs are resolved |
All amounts use the recorded currency. An option, spare part or controls task already inside a quote line must not be added a second time. Use a common currency/date basis and an explicit tax and financing convention if those apply. Keep a contingency separate from confirmed quotations. It reflects uncertainty rather than purchased capability.
Count recurring costs at accepted output
Choose an evaluation period and output requirement. A supplier’s nominal machine rate is not an annual accepted-case forecast. Use demonstrated operation and your own staffing, changeover, reject and schedule assumptions, each with a source or an uncertainty range.

Record recurring amounts for the whole period
Convert each estimate to the evaluation period before adding it. For example, record total assigned labour hours multiplied by the loaded cost per hour, or total kWh multiplied by cost per kWh. Use the source column for the quantity, rate and evidence; split categories into additional lines when rates differ. A yearly estimate needs the documented number of years or a period-specific schedule.
| ID | Recurring input, currency over the whole period | Proposal A amount | Proposal B amount | Quantity × rate / evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | Assigned operating labour | ___ | ___ | ___ hours × ___ currency/hour |
| R2 | Cases, tape/glue and other consumables | ___ | ___ | ___ units × ___ currency/unit; separate unlike units |
| R3 | Maintenance, parts and service | ___ | ___ | Dated estimate and service schedule: ___ |
| R4 | Utilities | ___ | ___ | ___ kWh × ___ currency/kWh; list other utilities separately |
| R5 | Other direct operating costs in the agreed scope | ___ | ___ | Defined cost and calculation: ___ |
| R | Recurring total = R1 + R2 + R3 + R4 + R5 | ___ | ___ | Calculate after all inputs are resolved |
Use labour and consumables that include the planned changeovers and rejects. Reduce Q to the accepted output expected under those same assumptions. Do not also add a lost-production charge for those cases unless your finance team defines a separate comparison that requires it. Allocate shared labour by its assigned hours.
Calculate and retain the results
| ID | Input or result | Unit / formula | Proposal A | Proposal B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | Documented residual value at evaluation end | Currency; enter zero if no residual is assumed | ___ | ___ |
| O | Ownership cost over the evaluation period | Currency; O = I + R − V | ___ | ___ |
| U | Cost per accepted case | Currency/case; U = O / Q, only for Q greater than zero | ___ | ___ |
Leave results open while required inputs are unresolved. Zero accepted cases makes unit cost undefined. A blank field represents missing evidence, not zero cost. Keep the same currency, evaluation period and accounting convention for both proposals. This simple sum uses undiscounted amounts; use your finance team’s approved model if the decision requires discounting.
Test the assumptions that change the decision
Recalculate using credible alternative order mixes and production windows. Keep each input’s basis beside the result. If the decision reverses when changeover frequency changes, the next useful evidence is a format-transition trial, not another decimal place in the purchase price.
Record the conditions that remain open: a new case size, an unusual product orientation or a receiving interface not yet demonstrated. The cartoner and case-packer comparison helps correct packaging-layer scope before those unknowns enter a cost model.
Methods and sources
The scope examples draw on the retrieved Wexxar catalog and Brenton RSC case-packing descriptions. Cost categories and formulas are editorial accounting proposals; no market average, price, savings percentage or payback is asserted. Marketplace search results were treated as scope-limited listings rather than evidence of installed project cost. Sources were retrieved on 16 October 2026. Return to case packers for related selection records.
Source documents read:
- RSC Standard Cases and Trays (retrieved 16 October 2026).
- Flex E Pack catalog (retrieved 16 October 2026).